NIX MOX BULLETIN BOARD
March, 2001
Welcome to the NIX MOX BULLETIN BOARD, a periodic posting of
MOX-related news and resources. The purpose of the Bulletin
Board is to help anti-MOX activists stay in touch with each other,
share news and information, and network locally, regionally,
nationally and internationally. Please send news to share to:
mox@wand.org.
Thanks for your help! (Click here if you are wondering,
what is MOX?)
- I. Take Action!
- A. EIS Scoping Meetings: We Need You!
- B. Other Opportunities for Action
- C. MOX and the Energy Crisis
- D. GA Sierra Club Anti-MOX Resolution
- II.Program News
- A. Immobilization Gets the Axe
- B. License Application Update
- C. Meeting on MOX and High Burnup Fuel
- III. International MOX News
- A. Japan Nixes MOX!
- B. Russia
- Vote on fuel import delayed
- Adamov dismissed
- C. UK: Sellafield Tries Again
- D. France: MOX Makes No Economic Sense
- IV. Resources and Web Pages
- A. SRS in the News
- B. MOX Activism
- C. Misc. Resources
A. EIS Scoping Meetings: We Need You!
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold public meetings to receive input on the scope of the forthcoming Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the direct, indirect and cumulative environmental impacts associated with the construction, operation and deactivation of the MOX fuel fabrication facility at Savannah River Site (SRS). Your participation is important! Meetings are:
April 17, 2001
North Augusta Community Center
496 Brookside Drive
North Augusta, SC
April 18, 2001
Coastal Georgia Center
305 Martin Luther King Blvd
Savannah, GA
(A third meeting may be held in Charlotte, NC at the end of April, but was not confirmed at press time.)
Both meetings run 7:00 to 10:00 p.m. YOU MUST REGISTER IN ADVANCE: call Betty Garrett, 301-415-5808, or email bsg@nrc.gov.
Southeast anti-MOX organizations will hold informational pre-meetings to help participants prepare. Contact Don Moniak of Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League for the North Augusta pre-meeting, and Sara Barczak of Georgians for Clean Energy for the Savannah pre-meeting.
Participation is important! Not only does it show the level of concern about the proposed MOX program, it is an opportunity to comment on what issues are covered in the EIS. Ask your friends, colleagues, family, and state representatives to join you!
If you can't attend the meetings, you can submit comments BY MAY 21st by mail, fax, or email:
Mail:
Mike Lesar, Acting Chief
US NRC, Rules and Diectives Branch
Division of Administrative Services
Office of Administration
Mail Stop T6D59, Washington, D.C. 20555
Fax: 301-415-5398 Attn: Tim Harris
Email: teh@nrc.gov
After comments are received, a Scoping Process Summary Report will be sent to all participants in the process. The draft EIS is due Feb. 2002.
MORE INFORMATION:
B. Other Opportunities for Action
- Protest MOX at NRC Meeting: April 16th, Atlanta
NRC Staff Mtg. open to public. Meeting topic: Performance at Catawba Nuclear Station
1:00 - 3:00 p.m.
NRC Region II Office, 61 Forsyth St., SW, Suite 24T20, Atlanta
This meeting is a self-assessment of performance presented to NRC by the Catawba site vice president.
Catawba is one of two nuclear stations slated for weapons MOX use.
- Alliance for Nuclear Accountability DC Days (Washington, DC)
- Trainings and workshops, including information on MOX
- Three days of meetings with Members of Congress and key Administration officials
- Pizza party / award reception / Excellent networking opportunity
Info. & registration: www.ananuclear.org
Jim Bridgeman: 202-833-4668 * jcbridgman@earthlink.net
- Action for Peace
April 7-8, 2001
Y-12 nuclear weapon plant, Oak Ridge, TN
Workshops, rallies, fellowship, direct action.
The Oak Ridge site is planning a $4 billion upgrade to continue nuclear weapons production activities.
The site is also involved in various aspects of the MOX program.
www.stopthebombs.org/calendar/AprilAction2001.html
- Petition against Price Anderson Act
www.petitiononline.com/repealpa/petition.html
Price Anderson protects the nuclear industry from financial responsibility in case of an accident, but fails to provide adequate protection to the public. Utilities using MOX increase accident risks.
Price Anderson is up for reauthorization - this petition calls for its repeal.
More info. on Price Anderson: www.geocities.com/priceanderson/
C. MOX and the Energy Crisis
New legislation in Washington (S 388 and S 389 from Sen. Murkowski and S 472 from Sen. Domenici) attempts to use current energy problems in the US to leverage support for the use of plutonium as fuel in nuclear reactors (that means MOX). The Bush Administration is expected to release similar proposals in early April.
To find out more and learn what you can do, see:
www.nirs.org (Nuclear Information and Resource Service)
or
www.citizen.org/CMEP/nuclearsafety/nuclearsafetycurrent.html
(Public Citizen Critical Mass Energy and Environment Program)
D. GA Sierra Club Passes Anti-MOX Resolution
On Feb. 27 the Georgia Chapter of the Sierra Club passed a resolution opposing MOX! Now it's time for other chapters to follow suit! If you are a Sierra Club member, please consider requesting that your local chapter pass this (or a similar) resolution.
Excerpt:
" ...the United States must regard plutonium as a dangerous liability, not as an energy resource.
We are strongly opposed to commercial use of plutonium in MOX or any other fuel form."
Full text: http://georgia.sierraclub.org/nltr/articles_1.html
(Thanks to Susan Bloomfield of GA Sierra Club.)
A. Immobilization Gets the Axe
Citing Bush Administration budget cuts, the Dept. of Energy (DOE) on March 19th zeroed out funding for the plutonium immobilization program and canceled the contract for construction of the immobilization facility, thus delaying the program indefinitely. The decision signals an apparent abandoning of the "dual-track" program for disposing of surplus weapons plutonium, leaving the DOE with no back-up plan for the technically unproven MOX option.
The DOE had planned on the immobilization option for some 17 tons of surplus weapons plutonium deemed too impure for MOX use. (The "immobilization option" refers to processing plutonium into a ceramic form and encasing it in highly radioactive glass.) Immobilization funds will now be shifted to MOX.
For safety and proliferation reasons, many environmental groups preferred immobilization over MOX and advocated its use for all 50 tons of US surplus plutonium. The DOE, however, is reported to be considering reprocessing the 17 tons of impure plutonium so that it could be used as MOX fuel.
The decision drew criticism from South Carolina Senator Strom Thurmond, though safety and proliferation concerns were conspicuously absent in his letter to DOE which advocated increased funding for both MOX and the SRS reprocessing canyons.
The semi-autonomous and secretive National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which houses the plutonium disposition program, explained the decision to de-fund immobilization with a profoundly vague and unenlightening announcement stating, "...we are continuing with the MOX facility design and construction --- but are opting to look at other aspects, such as the Immobilization Facility, in possible future budget cycles." (For more on this non-statement, contact Darwin J. Morgan, NNSA Public Affairs, 202-586-7554.)
Cuts in Funding to Russia
Other nonproliferation programs have been targeted by the Bush Administration, including US support for plutonium disposition in Russia. As reported in the industry publication "Energy Daily," administration officials suggested funding for Russian plutonium disposition could be sharply reduced or even eliminated. Reduction of US support of the program would deal a serious blow to Russian MOX plans -- anticipated funding from other western nations in the G-8 economic group has not been forthcoming, as hoped by DOE and the US State Department.
MORE INFORMATION:
"Energy agency halts site project"
http://augustachronicle.com/stories/032001/met_066-5212.000.shtml
"Thurmond presses for SRS project funds"
http://www.nci.org/wpu-immob-thurmond-co32501.htm
B. License Application Update
On February 28, the MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility Construction Authorization Request (CAR) was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) by Duke-Cogema-Stone & Webster (DCS), the consortium contracted by DOE for the US MOX program.
The NRC has 30 days to review the document before formal acceptance. Upon acceptance, a notice about hearings on the license request will be posted in the Federal Register. Anyone wanting to intervene in the licensing process would have 30 days from the time of that notice to submit contentions on the application. Georgians Against Nuclear Energy (GANE) is planning on intervening (see earlier Nix MOX Bulletins for more information or contact Glenn Carroll at atom.girl@mindspring.com.)
Actual copies of the document are hard to come by -- the NRC will either charge you for the privilege of reviewing it either in hard copy or on CD, or you can spend literally dozens of hours downloading it from their website.
A better option is to contact the industrious Don Moniak of Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League who has downloaded the entire document (plus extras) and can provide copies on CD (donations to cover costs accepted).
MORE INFORMATION:
NRC website on MOX licensing process:
www.nrc.gov/NRC/NMSS/MOX/index.html
C. Meeting on MOX and High Burnup Fuel
On Wed. April 4, the NRC Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Subcommittee on Reactor Fuels will meet to discuss the safety issues associated with the use of MOX and high burnup fuel. The meeting is open to the public, oral comments will be allowed with permission of the Subcommittee Chair, written comments will be accepted and made available to the Committee.
8:30 a.m. until completion
NRC Headquarters: 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD
Room T-2B3
For further information, permission to present oral statements, changes in meeting time or location, agenda adjustment, etc. contact ACRS staff engineer, Dr. Medhat El-Zeftawy, 301-415-6889 (between 7:30 and 4:15, eastern).
MORE INFORMATION:
A. Japan Nixes MOX!
Tokyo Electric Power Co. (Tepco) announced on March 30th that it will not load MOX fuel into its Fukushima reactors this year and the Fukushima MOX program will be delayed at least one year.
Strong local opposition, led by Fukushima Governor Eisaku Sato, was the main reason cited for the delay. Tepco also planned to use MOX at its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa plant in Niigata Prefecture, and Kansai Electric Power Co. is planning on using MOX at the Takahama nuclear plant in Fukui, but Tepco's announcement puts a damper on the entire Japanese "pluthermal" (MOX) program. It is also bad news for European MOX fabricators, particularly BNFL (British Nuclear Fuels Ltd.), who relies on Japan for a significant amount of its contracts (see below).
Meanwhile, a shipment of Belgian-fabricated MOX fuel arrived at the port of Kashiwazaki-Kariwa in British-flagged armed gunboats on March 24th, amid strong local protest (some 1,000 protesters marched in the streets against MOX several days before the ships arrived). Local residents also filed a petition calling for a plebiscite on the use of MOX at the plant (though earlier efforts have been rejected).
The shipment included 28 MOX fuel assemblies containing 220 kilograms of plutonium. In all, 2.2 metric tons of plutonium (in the form of oxides and MOX fuel) has been shipped from Europe to Japan since 1992, but none of it has been used as reactor fuel.
MORE INFORMATION:
Citizens' Nuclear Information Center - excellent resource.
www.cnic.or.jp/english/
Also by CNIC:
"Does Japan Really Need Plutonium Fuel?" (leaflet - online or hardcopy)
www.cnic.or.jp/english/transport/faq/index.html
(Thanks to CNIC, Pete Roche of Greenpeace UK, Nuclear Control Institute, and Green Action.)
B. Russia
- 1) Vote on fuel import delayed
Russian activists won a reprieve in their fight to stop the dumping of tens of thousands of tons of nuclear waste in Russia when the Duma (Lower House of Parliament) for the second time delayed a vote on the proposal. Opposition to the proposal has been growing amid allegations of corruption in the Russian Atomic Ministry, Minatom (see story below). A week earlier, the head of the Federation Council (Upper House of Parliament) Yegor Stroyev announced he was categorically opposed to the waste import plan, calling it "insane."
The decision to delay a vote to amend environmental laws so that the waste could be legally imported marks a dramatic change from December 2000, when in a first reading of the bill passed overwhelmingly. A new vote is not yet scheduled, but is not expected before the end of April. In the meantime, the Duma will organize public hearings on the issue. A recent poll showed 90% of the Russian public was opposed to the waste import plan.
- Adamov Dismissed
On March 28th, the same day the Duma delayed the waste import vote, Atomic Energy Minister Evgeny Adamov was dismissed by President Putin amid allegations of corruption and growing evidence of illegal business activities. Putin further called on the Russian parliament to reject Adamov's nuclear waste import proposal. Many Duma members had increasing suspicions about the financial arrangements of the plan.
Adamov will be replaced by Alexander Rumyantsev, former head of the Kurchatov nuclear research institute. Rumyantsev has expressed support for waste imports into Russia but has said "it should be carefully discussed."
(Thanks to Vladimir Sliviak of Ecodefense!, Nadejda L.Kutepova of Agency for Information Cooperation, and Tobias Muenchmeyer of Greenpeace International.)
C. UK: Sellafield Tries Again
The British government has launched its fourth consultation concerning opening BNFL's Sellafield MOX Plant. The £460m ($658m) facility, was completed in 1996 but never licensed. Before it is allowed to operate it must demonstrate that it is economically viable.
But in light of BNFL's 1999 safety data scandal (see past Nix-MOX bulletin boards) and subsequent fines and lost contracts, Sellafield's economic case has been difficult to build. Though BNFL has revamped its economic case for the plant, the recent announcement that Japan will delay its MOX program is another blow to Sellafield's economic outlook. Japan is BNFL's biggest MOX customer and has already canceled MOX contracts once in the wake of the 1999 scandal.
For consultation documents see:
www.environment.detr.gov.uk/consult/mox/sellafield/index.htm
The consultation ends May 23rd.
(Thanks to Pete Roche and David Lowry, environmental consultant in Stoneleigh, England)
D. France: MOX Makes No Economic Sense
A report by the French Commission on Sustainable Development (CFDD) issued in late February concluded that there is no economic justification for reprocessing and MOX fuel use in France. The Commission noted that "a single MOX reprocessing cycle" only reduces uranium fuel use by about 5 percent and emissions of transuranic elements (including plutonium) by 12-15 percent. At the same time, its exorbitant cost and need for storage three times longer than uranium fuel make it a poor energy choice. CFDD also said reprocessing does not reduce nuclear waste volume sufficiently to justify its cost.
Mycle Schneider of World Information Service on Energy in Paris (WISE-Paris) has provided an English translation of the report, available at:
www.wise-paris.org/ournews/news1.html
MORE INFORMATION ON FRENCH REPROCESSING AND MOX:
"Secret Shipments and Illegal Storage - The strange story of imported waste at la Hague"
www.wise-paris.org/ournewsframe/news3.html
(Thanks to Mycle Schneider)
A. SRS in the News
- "SRS firm ponders bankruptcy"
Augusta Chronicle 3/3/01
www.augustachronicle.com/stories/030301/met_066-5151.000.shtml
- "Production potential upsets some activists - Nuclear facility considers plan to build pits with plutonium"
Augusta Chronicle 3/11/01
www.augustachronicle.com/stories/031101/met_066-5146.000.shtml
- "Officials monitor SRS leak"
Augusta Chronicle 3/23/01
www.augustachronicle.com/stories/032301/met_066-5223.000.shtml
B. MOX Activism
- Press release on NGO's petition for full hearings on MOX Fuel Factory
http://www.bredl.org/press/2001/NRC_fullhearing.htm
- International Statement Opposing Plutonium Fuel
(web-based sign-on)
www.wand.org/moxstmt.html
C. Misc. Resources
- Nuclear Control Institute Non-Proliferation Headline News
Excellent source for world press on nuclear news, including MOX. Updated daily.
www.nci.org/news-today.htm
- Institute for Energy and Environmental Research Feb. 2001 Newsletter
"Plutonium End Game: Stop Reprocessing, Start Immobilizing"
www.ieer.org/sdafiles/vol_9/9-2/index.html
- NRC MOX information page:
Documents, archives, meeting announcements, etc.
http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/NMSS/MOX/
- How to find your state and federal reps!
Find reps by entering zip code - Project Vote Smart webpage:
www.vote-smart.org/index.phtml
(Keep them informed about MOX!)
- Tom MOX Rides Again!
More MOX cartoons from Tom Ferguson, Atlanta PSR
http://www.thebird.org/~nixmox/tom4.html
Return to Nix MOX Bulletin Board Index
WAND Home
The MOX BULLETIN BOARD is compiled by Women's
Action for New Directions (WAND) Education Fund. For
comments, suggestions, or to add or remove names from this
distribution list, contact Pat Ortmeyer, WAND Field Director
for Nuclear Waste Issues, at mox@wand.org or 406-327-
0785. Feel free to forward this bulletin, and please include
acknowledgment of WAND.
|