NIX MOX BULLETIN BOARD
December 20, 1999
Welcome to the NIX MOX BULLETIN BOARD, a periodic posting of
MOX-related news and resources. The purpose of the Bulletin
Board is to help anti-MOX activists stay in touch with each other,
share news and information, and network locally, regionally,
nationally and internationally. Please send news to share to:
port@bigsky.net.
Thanks for your help! (Click here if you are wondering,
what is MOX?)

In the interest of celebrating the season this is an abbreviated Bulletin Board.
Have a great holiday, everyone, and thanks for all your hard work in 1999!
- I. MOX Opposition and Activism in Michigan
- "The People Have Power"
- II. International MOX News and Updates
- BNFL Scandal "Indefinitely" Delays MOX in Japan
- III. Plutonium Disposition Program News
- A. Final EIS Record of Decision
- B. SRS Budget Cuts Will Hurt Immobilization
- IV.Articles, Op Eds, Web Resources
- A. Recent Articles and Op Eds
- B. MOX on the Web
- C. Past Issues of the Nix MOX Bulletin Board
- I. MOX OPPOSITION AND ACTIVISM IN MICHIGAN
"The People Have Power"
(By WAND's Herbert Scoville Jr. Peace Fellow, Stephanie Broughton)
Strong protest continues against Project Parallex, the Department of Energy's plan to ship test assemblies of MOX fuel from Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico to the Chalk River research reactor in Ontario, Canada. The test is to be carried out in parallel with Russia.
On Nov. 25, First Nations staged a dramatic protest in northern Michigan involving a human chain. On December 1st, the MOX Task Force organized a press conference outside of the Capitol Building in Lansing. Following the press conference, a contingent met with a representative of Governor Engler who stated that the Governor would not stand in the way of the transport.
Spurred on by the Governor's inaction, six Michigan residents and one organization decided to sue DOE in an attempt to block the plutonium shipment on the grounds that DOE did not perform sufficient research on the environmental and proliferation implications of the shipment and did not hold adequate public hearings on the subject.
On December 7th, Chief Justice Richard Enslen agreed with the plaintiffs and at a court hearing in Kalamazoo Enslen announced a 10-day restraining order that temporarily blocked the plutonium shipment through Michigan a significant victory for anti-MOX activists. Said Sault Ste. Marie Mayor Verna Lawrence, "It shows the people have power."
Activists then launched a weekend "NIX MOX Tour" leading up to the preliminary hearing on Tuesday December 14th. The tour began on Dec. 11th with a meeting in Sault Ste. Marie with Mayor Lawrence and featured a mock nuclear waste cask. On Sunday the tour visited Mackinaw and Saginaw and concluded on Monday near the State Capitol in Lansing.
MOX Shipment Allowed
After 3 days of hearings, on Friday, Dec. 17, Chief Judge Richard Enslen denied the preliminary injunction, lifting the temporary restraining order and allowing the shipment to go forward. The judge did, however, agree with the basic argument of the lawsuit:
"Plaintiffs have demonstrated a serious procedural injury which ordinarily would warrant remedy," the judge found. "However, due to the weighty considerations of United States foreign policy, nuclear non-proliferation, and the general interest of the Executive office ... the Court declines on equitable grounds to issue a preliminary injunction."
DOE is "pleased" by the decision, but has not announced when the shipment will take place. The itinerary will not be released to the public, but one indication is that it will take place in January. In response to the decision, Michigan State Rep. Andy Neumann, D-Alpena has proposed a million-dollar fine for transporting nuclear material across bridges spanning Great Lakes water.
Activists will continue to fight the shipment and are asking anti-MOX activists across the country and particularly along the transportation route to contact their elected officials to urge DOE to cancel this shipment and the entire MOX program. For more information or for a copy of the text of the judge's decision, contact Kay Cumbow at . To see DOE's response to comments on
Project Parllex see: http://twilight.saic.com/md/announce.asp.
(Thanks to Kay Cumbow for this information.)
- II. INTERNATIONAL MOX NEWS AND UPDATES
BNFL Scandal "Indefinitely" Delays MOX in Japan
In a victory for anti-MOX activists, Kansai Electric announced on December 16 that it would indefinitely postpone loading MOX fuel into its Takahama 4 power station. The decision came in the wake of confirmation that the MOX fuel, provided by British Nuclear Fuels Ltd. (BNFL) included MOX pellets that were part of a batch on which quality control data had been falsified. In light of these developments, the MOX program at the Fukushima No. 1 Plant in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture has also been put on hold. Kansai announced it will accept no further MOX shipments from BNFL.
Until December 16, BNFL denied that the pellets in question were part of the shipment sent to Japan in September. Takashi Fukaya, Japan's Industry Minister, referred to the data falsification and cover-up as "deplorable," and said "trust in BNFL has collapsed."
The Japanese nuclear industry may turn to French or Belgian companies for future supplies of MOX fuel, a move that could deliver a fatal blow to BNFL's plans to open its Sellafield MOX Plant. Japan is also one of BNFL's largest reprocessing customers, and BNFL's THORP reprocessing plant generates around 60 percent of BNFL's operating profits, according to British utility brokerage firm Williams de Broe.
In an attempt at damage control, BNFL released a statement on December 16 apologizing to Japanese regulators for the "unfortunate incident," saying it "supports" the decision not to load the MOX fuel. It is possible the MOX fuel may have to have to be shipped back to Britain. Three BNFL employees have been fired over the incident.
(Thanks to Pete Roche for this information.)
III. PLUTONOIUM DISPOSITION PROGRAM NEWS
A. Final EIS Record of Decision
The Record of Decision (ROD) for DOE's Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on plutonium disposition was not released as of this writing, but is expected any time after December 20. No significant changes from the Final EIS are expected, though developments related to Project Parallex may be included. Look for announcement of the ROD at: http://twilight.saic.com/md/announce.asp.
If you don't yet have your very own copy of the 8-inch thick EIS, contact Bert Stevenson in the Office of Fissile Materials Disposition office at: 202-586-5368, or send a written request to: OFMD, US DOE, PO Box 23786, Washington DC 20026-3786.
B. SRS Budget Cuts Will Hurt Immobilization
DOE will decide in January which programs to cut at its Savannah River Site (SRS) plant to make up a $77 million budget shortfall. Proposed for the chopping block is the replacement plant for the failed $489 million In-Tank Precipitation Facility (ITP), which was shut down in January 1998 due to problems of flammable benzene building up inside the facility's tanks.
DOE claims that without ITP it cannot proceed with construction of a plutonium immobilization facility. Construction funds for that facility were zeroed out in FY2000 spending bills.
DOE seems less than determined to solve the ITP problem. In October a committee of the National Research Council released a preliminary report faulting the DOE for failing to produce a cogent plan for fixing ITP, even though 22 months had lapsed since the problem first developed. The NRC committee said it was "puzzled by the lack of program planning," noting that "there are no written R&D plans" for DOE's options to fix the facility. The NRC's final report is due out in April 2000.
(Thanks to Kathy Crandall of Alliance for Nuclear Accountability for this information.)
IV. ARTICLES, OP EDS, WEB RESOURCES
A. Recent Articles and Op Eds
The Atlanta Journal Constitution published an excellent editorial opposing MOX on December 7, 1999, "Don't recycle plutonium." For a faxed copy write to port@bigsky.net
Some excerpts:
"The Clinton administration is dangerously close to tossing out a longstanding, vital policy on the control of nuclear bomb-making material, with particularly unsettling consequences for Georgia and South Carolina.
"DOE is proposing a new plutonium processing mission for SRS while refusing to contend with contamination from past activities there.
"It would be a deeply disturbing irony if decommissioning nuclear weapons ended up making the world just as jittery as before. Converting "megatons to megawatts" might make a catchy slogan, but it's bad policy."
Letter to Editor in reply:
RECYCLING PLUTONIUM:
Federal agency's fuel plan faces hurdles
Joan O. King - For the Journal-Constitution
Tuesday " December 14
The editorial "Don't recycle plutonium" (Dec. 7) is welcome, but it failed to tell readers what they can do to stop it. The U.S. Department of Energy's plan to spend billions of dollars on a facility to produce plutonium fuel (MOX) depends on finding a commercial power plant willing to use it. The editorial touches on this but fails to name the plant and explain that there is resistance to MOX from stockholders who believe the plan is physically and financially dangerous.
At the last Duke Energy stockholders meeting, a stockholders' initiative opposing the use of MOX in Duke's reactors received a significant percentage of the vote. If opposition grows at the next meeting in April or if Duke is criticized by the general public, Duke may withdraw from the plan, and the DOE may have to rethink the whole project.
JOAN O. KING
(Joan King is a WAND volunteer and free-lance writer living in Sautee, GA.)
B. MOX on the Web
- DOE's Response to Parallex Comments
See: http://twilight.saic.com/md/announce.asp
A few repeats, worth repeating:
- Concerned Canadians For Nuclear Responsibility: http://www.ccnr.org/
Interesting excerpts of CCNR testimony as well as articles related to CANDU reactors and plutonium shipments into Canada.
- Nuclear Industry Licensing
http://techconf.llnl.gov/cgi-bin/library?source=*&library=Part_70_lib
Includes commentary from the nuclear industry on the licensing amendment that would allow licensing of the MOX fabrication plant, or plants involved in any plutonium processing.
- World Information Service on Energy:
http://antenna.nl/wise/
International perspective on MOX. "The MOX Myth" takes you to a comprehensive history of the issue with sections on MOX in various countries including Japan, India, the EU, and Russia.
C. Past Issues of the Nix MOX Bulletin Board
Reminder: Past editions of the Nix MOX Bulletin Board can be found on the web at: www.wand.org/issuesact/nixmox-index.html.
See Nix MOX Bulletin Board for:
November 25, 1999
September 14, 1999
Return to Nix MOX Bulletin Board Index
The MOX BULLETIN BOARD is compiled by Women's
Action for New Directions (WAND) Education Fund. For
comments, suggestions, or to add or remove names from this
distribution list, contact Pat Ortmeyer, WAND Field Director
for Nuclear Waste Issues, at port@bigsky.net or 406-327-
0785. Feel free to forward this bulletin, and please include
acknowledgment of WAND.
|