NIX MOX BULLETIN BOARD
March 22, 2000
Russian Sign-on Letter
Opposing Import of Spent Fuel
Friends!
Please add your signature to this appeal. On March 23, the Russian
government will review whether to authorize the importation of
radioactive material into Russia from other countries. Many
organizations around the world have already agreed to unite with Russian
NGOs and sign-on to this letter. Now the letter has been translated
into English and will be disseminated around the world.
Aleksei Yablokov
March 20, 2000
Statement of non-governmental environmental organizations on the plan to
export-import spent nuclear fuel
At the present time, countries that have developed nuclear energy have
run into the problem of storage and burial of spent nuclear fuel and
radioactive waste. Not wanting to use its territory for the repository
of these dangerous materials, the governments and nuclear-energy
companies of these countries are trying to transport them to other
countries that are experiencing economic difficulties, in particular, to
Russia. Earlier attempts by industrial countries to establish
international repositories for spent nuclear fuel in Australia, South
Africa and Namibia were not successful. Proposals by private companies
to construct such a repository on one of the islands in the Pacific
Ocean that belongs to the US caused a sharp negative reaction by the
White House.
Russian legislation forbids the import of foreign radioactive materials
for storage and burial on Russian territory. The Ministry of the
Russian Federation on atomic energy (Minatom), which is counting on
receiving the material into its custody and developing its potential, is
lobbying to change this law and is making preparations for organizations
of commercial storage and for the reprocessing of foreign radioactive
waste and spent nuclear fuel in its facilities. The Russian
authorities, which are facing a continual budget deficit, are ready to
change the law.
The administration of the US, worried on the one hand about the security
of fissile materials and the possible leaking of nuclear specialists
from Russia, and on the other hand, not wanting to store spent nuclear
fuel on its own territory from countries that use in their reactors
nuclear fuel that was produced in the US, is giving in to the support of
the commercial storage of foreign radioactive materials in Russia.
The United States, in exchange for giving permission to Russia to import
spent nuclear fuel from Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Switzerland,
Germany, and other countries, requires that Russia stop reprocessing
spent nuclear fuel and further accumulation of plutonium. But the
accepted conception in Russia of a closed fuel cycle envisages such
reprocessing. Minatom promises (under the conditions of constructing
many new nuclear power plants) to curtail the production of plutonium
for only 200 years. Having at its disposal large stock of Russian spent
nuclear fuel, Minatom is ready to agree with the US requirement to give
up reprocessing of foreign spent nuclear fuel today in order to be able
to use it in the future in its facilities, which are constructed with
“radioactive” money.
Minatom maintains that the resources they receive from storing
radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel will go first to remediate land
that has been polluted by radionuclides during the Cold War. However,
it is clear that a primary part of the resources that are received in
the waste business go into building new nuclear power plants, factories
for reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, and other environmentally and
politically dangerous projects.
The waste business, in which Minatom intends to earn money, will result
in the deterioration of the environmental situation in Russia and create
significant additional risks for the population during the transport of
spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste and the management of dangerous
wastes.
It is disturbing to us that negotiations on the management of
radioactive and nuclear materials, which affects the interests of the
whole world, go on in secret from the public. We hold that this leads
to the weakening of international and national environmental legislation
and undermines the foundations of civil society.
We hold that countries, in which long-term radionuclides were obtained
in reactors, should take full responsibility for their safe storage
during the time it is necessary for full decay of all long-term
radionuclides.
We hold that the Russian and US governments and other nuclear countries
should first take care of the safe storage of the large quantities of
already manufactured plutonium.
We categorically come out against the import and export of spent nuclear
fuel and radioactive waste. We are against earning “dirty” money in the
morally unacceptable “waste business,” which carries numerous
misfortunes for current and future generations, we are against double
standards.
We hold that reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel, which inevitably leads
to the management of a large quantity of radioactive waste and to
extraction of new quantities of plutonium, should be stopped in all
countries.
We are in favor of every future generation living in a less dangerous
world.
Signed,
L. Popova Center for nuclear ecology and energy policy, SEU
A. Yablokov Center for environmental policy in Russia
E. Kriusanov Program on nuclear and radioactive safety, SEU
|