<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WAND Education Fund &#187; House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wand.org/tag/house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wand.org</link>
	<description>Women. Power. Peace.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome 2013 – Ready for the Fiscal Roller Coaster?</title>
		<link>http://www.wand.org/2013/01/03/welcome-2013-ready-for-the-fiscal-roller-coaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wand.org/2013/01/03/welcome-2013-ready-for-the-fiscal-roller-coaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Cliff deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Year's deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wand.org/?p=4461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have caught glimpses of the fiscal showdown votes and speeches, and finally a deal, in between your activities to ring in the New Year. The final deal did settle some significant issues about taxes and fixed up some other issues; the price of milk won’t skyrocket (sigh of relief) and Congress won’t receive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4464" title="" src="http://www.wand.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/roller-coaster.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="167" />You might have caught glimpses of the fiscal showdown votes and speeches, and finally a deal, in between your activities to ring in the New Year. The final deal did settle some significant issues about taxes and fixed up some other issues; the price of milk won’t skyrocket (sigh of relief) and Congress won’t receive a cost-of-living pay increase (which some might call a bit of justice). To see more details about the elements of this latest deal, we highly recommend <strong><a href="http://nationalpriorities.org/en/analysis/2013/fiscal-cliff-deal/">The Fiscal Cliff Deal analysis</a></strong> from the National Priorities Project.</p>
<p>But hang on for the ride – there will be a few more fiscal “cliffs,” “curbs,” “mudslides,” “berms,” or whatever bumpy metaphor you might like to use. Decisions about <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">spending cuts</span></em> of the so-called “sequestration” were <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">not</span></em> part of this deal. Instead they were passed off to the next Congress being sworn in on January 3, 2012 to figure out with a new March 1 deadline. And by the way, the budget for Fiscal Year 2013 was never completed. Instead Congress passed a stop-gap Continuing Resolution funding the government until March 27. We need a deal by then to keep the government running. In addition, we are reaching the debt ceiling. Without congressional agreement to raise the debt ceiling, we risk government shutdown, defaulting on loans and economic disasters.</p>
<p>Ready for more? In the midst of this roller coaster start to 2013, there will be plenty of need to raise the issue of budget priorities. We cannot afford to make cuts to everything else while letting the bloated Pentagon budget escape fiscal discipline. Fortunately, some new voices are starting to recognize this, too. Conservative leader of Americans for Tax Reform, Grover <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/Norquist-deal-tax-cut/2013/01/01/id/469689">Norquist, says that</a>, “Serious conservatives need to declare that they, that taxpayers, are looking at the entire budget and saying, ‘where can we be more efficient and more effective?’ We have a rather large Pentagon budget, larger than most of the other countries in the world that have armies, navies, and air forces combined.”</p>
<p>Nevertheless we know well that the defense industry lobbyists are ready to make the case for <em>more</em> nuclear weapons, <em>more</em> F-35s, maybe even more bayonets and a cavalry, too.</p>
<p>We hope you are as ready as those lobbyists – ready to make the case for budget priorities that will lead us to safety, strength and prosperity, even if we have to make it through a few bumps and spins to get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wand.org/2013/01/03/welcome-2013-ready-for-the-fiscal-roller-coaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reshaping Pentagon Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.wand.org/2013/01/02/reshaping-pentagon-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wand.org/2013/01/02/reshaping-pentagon-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WAND In The Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wand.org/?p=4456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by GA State Senator Nan Grogan Orrock, president of the Women Legislators' Lobby Published: December 4, 2012 by The Hill's Congress Blog Republished: December 22, 2012 by NJ Today With the campaigns over, our leaders must roll up their sleeves and get to work on the serious financial decisions facing the nation. Congress has known [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4457" src="http://www.wand.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/change-coins-300x178.jpg" alt="" width="168" height="99" />by GA State Senator Nan Grogan Orrock, president of the Women Legislators' Lobby</p>
<p>Published: December 4, 2012 by <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/270875-rebalancing-pentagon-spending">The Hill's Congress Blog</a></p>
<p>Republished: December 22, 2012 by <a href="http://njtoday.net/2012/12/22/opinion-reshaping-pentagon-spending/">NJ Today</a></p>
<p>With the campaigns over, our leaders must roll up their sleeves and get to work on the serious financial decisions facing the nation. Congress has known for more than a year that automatic budget cuts and tax increases loom in January, but they’ve left all the work to be done at the last minute. They need to hear from us that we expect them to make a balanced deal to preserve programs that strengthen our nation while making sensible budget cuts to programs that are wasteful or unnecessary.</p>
<p>As state legislators, we battled to maintain critical investments in our states as revenues plunged with the start of the Great Recession. We provide many services to our communities in partnership with the federal government, so the possibility of further deep cuts to these programs is of great concern. Education, health care, housing, and transportation, along with an array of lesser known but equally important programs, are critically important to meet the needs of our citizens.</p>
<p>These programs are especially important right now as people still face significant struggles to recover from the down economy. Millions have lost their jobs, or face the daily fear of layoffs, decreased hours and reduced wages. It’s often said that we can’t afford to meet these needs and rebuild the economy, but really we can’t afford not to. It’s simply a question of government spending priorities that serve the greater good versus a handful of special interests.</p>
<p>Our leaders must recognize the need for investments that promote jobs and build the economy, even as we cut back on spending. Unlike most other areas of spending, the Pentagon budget has grown unchecked for the past decade. But it is not clear that these dollars are the investment we need for the 21st century. Reshaping Pentagon spending, which currently eats up more than half of the discretionary spending that Congress allocates annually, will be crucial to any deal on the federal budget.</p>
<p>America maintains a large and expensive nuclear arsenal from the Cold War era. For the cost of just one new nuclear submarine, we could provide body armor and bomb-resistant Humvees to all our troops overseas, house and treat every homeless U.S. veteran, and still have $2.2 billion left over to pay down debt. Our troops and security should come before pork-barrel programs.</p>
<p>Our national security priorities must include a reduction in drawn-out expensive wars with massive price tags and lasting negative effects felt here at home and in the nations where wars are waged. We are still stuck in Afghanistan – America’s longest war. We need an exit strategy that focuses on a political solution in Afghanistan, with particular concern for the welfare of women and children.</p>
<p>Responsibly reshaping Pentagon spending would free up money for much-needed investments here at home. Programs that keep us safe, like border security, disaster relief, and air traffic control, and programs that are investments in our long-term economic stability, like education, all face cuts in the coming year. Necessary funding to state and local communities is also on the chopping block. This November and December, we must urge our leaders to find a balanced approach to the so-called “fiscal fiasco” that does not exempt Pentagon spending at the expense of crucial domestic programs.</p>
<p>We are at a critical crossroads in deciding how we as a nation want to spend our money and build our economy. Do we want to invest in education? Roads and bridges? Safe communities and safe borders? Or do we want to continue pouring money into wasteful programs that the Pentagon doesn’t want or need? Will we reshape the Pentagon budget to address 21st century threats, or continue to waste money on Cold War-era weapons?</p>
<p>The good people of Georgia and all fifty states are relying on Congress to find a balanced approach to put us back on the path to prosperity. Our vote on November 6 expressed a belief that Americans, working together, can craft solutions and rebuild our national economy. The votes have been counted. Let’s get to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wand.org/2013/01/02/reshaping-pentagon-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is afraid of the Big Bad U.N.?</title>
		<link>http://www.wand.org/2013/01/02/who-is-afraid-of-the-big-bad-u-n/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wand.org/2013/01/02/who-is-afraid-of-the-big-bad-u-n/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WAND In The Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wand.org/?p=4452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Sayre Sheldon, WAND NGO Representative for the U.N. Working Group for Women, Peace, and Security, and WAND Ed Fund Board member/Treasurer Published: December 25, 2012 by the Cambridge Chronicle &#38; Tab Cambridge — The answer, of course, is that we are -- or, more specifically, our Senate is; they just refused to ratify the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft  wp-image-4453" src="http://www.wand.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/peace-branches-300x215.png" alt="" width="240" height="172" />by Sayre Sheldon, WAND NGO Representative for the U.N. Working Group for Women, Peace, and Security, and WAND Ed Fund Board member/Treasurer</p>
<p>Published: December 25, 2012 by the <a href="http://www.wickedlocal.com/cambridge/news/x1781249047/COLUMN-Who-is-afraid-of-the-Big-Bad-U-N?#axzz2GqHLk8ZW">Cambridge Chronicle &amp; Tab</a></p>
<div>Cambridge — The answer, of course, is that we are -- or, more specifically, our Senate is; they just refused to ratify the U.N. Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.</div>
<div>
<div>
<p>Why else would the Senate vote against a treaty based on our own Americans With Disabilities Act signed by President Bush in 1990? A treaty solidly supported by veterans groups and child advocates, negotiated by George W. Bush and defended on the Senate floor by Bob Dole in his wheelchair? It is absurd that the Senate did not pass legislation protecting the rights of wounded soldiers and veterans.</p>
<p>We have to ask why these senators risked their careers by taking such an unpopular stand. All editorials ascribe the reason to be the hold of some people’s overriding opposition to the U.N. for its potential attack on U.S. sovereignty. To those who align with this stance; signing any international treaty means "loss of our freedom." And, unfortunately, a large sector of the U.S. population also believes that the major goal of the U.N. is a takeover of America. But why do our senators accept a myth that has no basis in fact? Aren’t elected officials supposed to educate the public instead of misleading it?</p>
<p>If we dig deeper, more specific reasons appear in their statements -- the rights of parents to choose treatments for a disabled child or to home-school that child were some of the objections raised. Changes in our healthcare system inevitably "leading to socialism" were also cited. And, of course, sinister changes in our reproductive practices were raised. Not that the treaty would have any power to legislate these things. Baffling to me was the Heritage Foundation’s charge that profits of U.S. corporations might be threatened. Corporate welfare is always good fodder for a policy debate on protecting human rights.</p>
<p>Last week we celebrated International Human Rights Day. This treaty represents a major advance for human rights. A long-sought goal for the United Nations is the general acceptance that all people have a right to respect, protection, education and adequate healthcare. The U.S. was the leader in establishing the very idea of human rights. We must not let our country step back from its beliefs in such a cowardly way.</p>
<p>One hundred and twenty-five countries have ratified this treaty, including Russia and China. Some are asking why we should join with countries that have such poor human rights records. My answer would be that is exactly why we should join -- to convince others of our own good record on disabilities.</p>
</div>
</div>
<p>And, besides, we are not exempt from questions about our own human rights policies -- the use of drones, our inability to ratify the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and our growing and unchecked Pentagon budget that allocates funds to war and defense contractors instead of vital programs that address healthcare, hunger, child abuse and education, for example.</p>
<p>Steve Rothstein, president of the Perkins School for the Blind, said that he could not sleep if he were one of the senators voting no. When he explained that 4.5 million children in the world cannot go to school because they are blind, I could only think of our neighbor’s child who is a student at Perkins and has made great progress there.</p>
<p>It is time to join the rest of the world and work for the goals that represent our better selves.</p>
<p>I and my fellow advocates at Women’s Action for New Directions will be watching and hoping for another vote in the next Congress. Next time, let’s get it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wand.org/2013/01/02/who-is-afraid-of-the-big-bad-u-n/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>